Friday February 22, 2019
sub

Sri Lanka could join TPP, think of trade and investment as one: Razeen Sally

Aug 05, 2015 11:42 AM GMT+0530 | 2 Comment(s)

POLICY SUMMIT:  Razeen Sally speaking at Sri Lanka Economic Summit 2015

ECONOMYNEXT - Sri Lanka could apply to be part of an evolving Trans-Pacific Partnership, while pursuing a free trade agreement with the US, and start to think of trade and investment as a single issue, a top international economist said.

Razeen Sally, a London School of Economics professor who is now with the National University of Singapore, told an economic forum in Colombo that the 'big prize' of any trade negotiations would be an FTA with the US.

"Why? Not just because of the export market. The United States remains the future in terms of being the most innovative economy in the world," Sally said.

"But also because when we have an agreement with the United States, unlike with India and the others it is a really hard agreement, it is not a soft agreement. And that means more domestic reforms and that is the real prize."

Sri Lanka should get into global value chains, leveraging competencies and advantages in logistical services he said.

"The important thing in trying to attract the right kind of value chains is to think of trade and investment and domestic economic policy as interconnecting as opposed to separate compartments."

At the moment the US, Canada, several Asian and Latin American countries are negotiating a Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is expected to bring those countries closer together. Investors including those from the US are already investing in countries like Vietnam ahead of the TPP.

While the TPP was not completed yet, there was strong possibility of it being wrapped up by the end of the year. Instead of negotiating a separate FTA Sri Lanka could apply to join the TPP, Sally said.

"Sri Lanka should assess the TPP very carefully, the costs and benefits once the agreement becomes public, and then make a strategic decision whether it should apply to join the TPP," Sally said.

"It would be a great branding exercise because it would be the first South Asian country to join 40 percent of the world economy in a new so-called deep integration free trade agreement."

He said it may mean big reforms at home and a political backlash but it may be worth the expense.

He said Sri Lanka should also think about an FTA with the EU going beyond the GSP+ facility.

Sri Lanka should also strongly push for integration with India, while possibilities of getting closer to the ASEAN regional also existed starting with Singapore. Sri Lanka was already working with a trade deal with China.

Sri Lanka could apply to join the WTO, Information Technology Agreement of the WTO which is about to be updated.

Sri Lanka should also align its negotiation process with East Asian and Latin American countries rather than with countries that "shoot themselves on the foot," he said.

Sally said Sri Lanka should however set definite priorities and not get involved with trade deals with too many small countries.

Sally said an agreement with India should be pursued and forget about a South Asia free trade region because it will not take place unless India takes the lead.

He said Sri Lanka will not be able to achieve these objectives because the country now lacked capacity because the Ministry of Commerce and Industry had been 'eviscerated' during the last decade.

Sri Lanka should consider creating a combined ministry of international trade and investment.

"Trade would then be coupled with investment," Sally said.

"You cannot think of a coherent 21st century trade policy today in which investment and trade are not mentioned in the same breath. It will have to be led by a clean competent minister with international exposure."

 

 

 


 

Related Stories

2 Comments

  1. BW August 05, 07:06 AM

    China was a most innovative place. For centuries Chinese invented many things during feudal and imperial times. China's set back was recent and that was due to bad government, then communism and state control. All this seems to suggest that there was a lot of space for free thinking in traditional times and-or Confucian philosophy etc. From 1978 China abandoned state controls progressively and allowed private property-investment and also foreign investment. So the Communist party of China and the state can only hold back the people for so long. The more economic and thinking freedom the states allows, the more innovative the people will be. The US is still the country where most papers are published and a lot of patents are filed. As Chinese become free thinkers progressively they will overtake the US. When China's non-state universities grow things will change even faster. The US still wins the most Nobel prizes but many of them migrated there. Chinese are also flooding US Universities and some are not going back but many are.Though Chinese and Chinese companies are publishing a lot of papers, which is good, but that by itself does not mean much.For example take the case of our own CKDu kidney disease which was linked to glysophate. That paper was published by the 'International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.'It is a nice hypothesis but it was untested. So 'hypothesis generating' is fine but that is not really complete scientific 'research'. No animal studies were done to establish that what was speculated was actually happening. The 'International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health' where you can pay and publish stuff is owned by a MDPI, a Chinese linked company that is extremely controversial en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MDPI. The peer reviewed journals in the West were established by people like you and me - not the state - and they evolved with some procedures so that the public - people like you and me - eventually accepted that they produced some useful stuff without benefit of any state involvement. Also remember that the modern nation state, nationalism, protectionism, ethno religious fascism/Nazism, socialism, communism was all 'invented' in the West though through liberals managed to defeat those ideas through an apeal to reason to a greater or lesser extent in those countries.

  2. Kalusudda August 05, 06:35 AM

    Razeen does not seem to know what NOW is going on in US,Europe,Mid East, India etc. Just visit US,UK,Europe and see who the real investors, tourists are. Also who is publishing scientific papers, registering patents, innovating in many areas. Its certainly not the anglo saxon driven past colonial powers. Yes one are a they are still dominating wars, military hardware, weapons.....its tragic living there, this stark reality stares you in the face daily

Name *
Email *
Designation
Company
Telephone Number