An Echelon Media Company
Saturday May 18th, 2024

Sri Lanka bond holders earned high returns, should now take the hit: Picketty, academics

ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s private bondholders who received a risk premium must now take the consequences of default, and international financial institutions should also do more to help the island which, a group of academics have said.

“Private creditors own almost 40% of Sri Lanka’s external debt stock, mostly in the form of International Sovereign Bonds (ISBs), but higher interest rates mean that they receive over 50% of external debt payments,” a group of 182 academics including from Harvard, Princeton, Cornell and the London School of Economics said a statement.

“Such lenders charged a premium to lend to Sri Lanka to cover their risks, which accrued them massive profits and contributed to Sri Lanka’s first ever default in April 2022. Lenders who benefited from higher returns because of the “risk premium” must be willing to take the consequences of that risk.”

The statement was released by Debt Justice, a UK based charity.

Private creditors held around 50 percent of the debt, and questioned whether sovereign bond holders have engaged in risky lending to corrupt politicians.

“In addition, the lack of transparency of the debt negotiation process and accountability of the holders of ISBs underscores the concern that risky lending to corrupt politicians (leading to what is now recognised as “odious debt”) was a significant element in generating the current debt crisis,” the statement said.

“Apart from revealing the identity of ISB holders, it is also important to disclose how ISBs were deployed, and the use of those funds.

The academics also questioned the role of International Financial Institutions such as the IMF and World Bank.

“They were founded to assist sovereign nations, particularly in contexts in which financial markets would not deliver, to ensure financial stability and prevent or reduce the impact of financial crises, and to provide resources for crucial investments required to meet social and developmental needs,” the statement said.

“The IFIs are not currently living up to these responsibilities, at a time when they are most urgently required. In Sri Lanka they encouraged the very policies of more open capital accounts and deregulation that have led to the current crisis.

“They have been slow to respond to the crisis, and are apparently requiring onerous policy and fiscal conditionalities, such as moving to a primary fiscal surplus in a very short time, even as the economy continues to plunge.”

Sri Lanka was able to build up foreign debt partly due to ‘unconditional’ lending by private lenders as well as China which gave budget support loans according to some critics.

The final collapse came amid unprecedented excessive anti-austerity measures involving massive deficits and funding of new and maturing domestic debt by the central bank over the past two years which led to a quick depletion of foreign reserves and lack of external conditions.

“The implications are already evident in the recent Budget of the Sri Lankan government, which has unrealistic revenue assumptions that are unlikely to be met,” the statement claimed.

“Revenue shortfalls would then necessitate further “austerity” and likely cuts in essential public spending. The Budget also proposes public asset stripping and privatization of strategic lands, marine resources, energy, transport and telecom infrastructure and public enterprises.”

The full statement is reproduced below:

Statement by academics on dealing with Sri Lankan debt, January 2023

Sri Lanka, along with many other low- and middle-income countries, has experienced a series of
financial shocks due to both external and internal factors. Global forces have caused food and energy
import costs to soar and interest rates to rise, even as the currency has devalued significantly.

These shocks, along with a history of policy mismanagement—and specifically the deregulation and
openness that encouraged irresponsible borrowing, enabled illicit financial flows out of the country
and assisted political corruption—have intensified external debt and balance of payments crises.

Over the last decade of liquidity expansion and low interest rates in the world economy, private
lenders provided loans to low- and middle-income countries, at higher interest rates than for
advanced countries. These higher rates were purportedly due to greater risk exposure that could make
debt repayment more difficult in such countries. That risk has now materialised, firstly through a
global pandemic, and then the price shocks and interest rate increases of 2022.

Private creditors own almost 40% of Sri Lanka’s external debt stock, mostly in the form of International
Sovereign Bonds (ISBs), but higher interest rates mean that they receive over 50% of external debt
payments. Such lenders charged a premium to lend to Sri Lanka to cover their risks, which accrued
them massive profits and contributed to Sri Lanka’s first ever default in April 2022.

Lenders who benefited from higher returns because of the “risk premium” must be willing to take the consequences of that risk. Indeed, ISBs are now trading at significantly lower prices in the secondary market. In this context, giving private bondholders an upper hand relative to sovereign debtors in the Paris Club and the IMF’s required debt negotiations violates the basic principles of natural justice.

In addition, the lack of transparency of the debt negotiation process and accountability of the holders
of ISBs underscores the concern that risky lending to corrupt politicians (leading to what is now
recognised as “odious debt”) was a significant element in generating the current debt crisis. Apart
from revealing the identity of ISB holders, it is also important to disclose how ISBs were deployed, and
the use of those funds.

Debt negotiations in Sri Lanka are now at a crucial stage. All lenders—bilateral, multilateral, and
private—must share the burden of restructuring, with assurance of additional financing in the near
term. However, Sri Lanka on its own cannot ensure this; it requires much greater international
support. Instead of geopolitical manoeuvring, all of Sri Lanka’s creditors must ensure debt
cancellation sufficient to provide a way out of the current crisis.

The role of multilateral organisations, particularly the international financial institutions (IFIs), such as the IMF and the World Bank, is also significant. They were founded to assist sovereign nations,
particularly in contexts in which financial markets would not deliver, to ensure financial stability and
prevent or reduce the impact of financial crises, and to provide resources for crucial investments
required to meet social and developmental needs.

The IFIs are not currently living up to these responsibilities, at a time when they are most urgently
required. In Sri Lanka they encouraged the very policies of more open capital accounts and
deregulation that have led to the current crisis. They have been slow to respond to the crisis, and are
apparently requiring onerous policy and fiscal conditionalities, such as moving to a primary fiscal
surplus in a very short time, even as the economy continues to plunge.

The implications are already evident in the recent Budget of the Sri Lankan government, which has
unrealistic revenue assumptions that are unlikely to be met. Revenue shortfalls would thennecessitate further “austerity” and likely cuts in essential public spending. The Budget also
proposes public asset stripping and privatization of strategic lands, marine resources, energy,
transport and telecom infrastructure and public enterprises.

These policies will harm the most vulnerable groups in Sri Lanka, exacerbate poverty and inequality, and lead to further economic decline. Instead the focus should be on legal and regulatory changes to stem the illicit outflow of capital through transfer pricing and trade mis-invoicing over the past 15 years, which is estimated to be far more than the aggregate foreign debt of Sri Lanka, and on taxation of wealth and consumption of the super-rich.

The Sri Lankan case will provide an important indicator of whether the world—and the international
financial system in particular—is equipped to deal with the increasingly urgent questions of sovereign
debt relief and sustainability; and to ensure a modicum of justice in international debt negotiations. It
is therefore crucial not only for the people of Sri Lanka, but to restore any faith in a multilateral system that is already under fire for its lack of legitimacy and basic viability.

1. Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, USA and India;
2. Dani Rodrik, Ford Foundation Professor of Political Economy, Harvard University, USA;
3. Thomas Piketty, Professor of Economics, Ecole d’economie de Paris/Paris School of Economics,
France
4. Ravi Kanbur, T. H. Lee Professor of World Affairs, Professor of Economics, Cornell University, U.S.A.;
5. Atul Kohli, David Bruce Professor of International Affairs, Princeton University, USA
6. Sakiko Fakuda-Parr, Professor of International Affairs, The New School, USA;
7. Gary Dymski, Professor of Applied Economics, University of Leeds, UK.
8. Robert H Wade, Professor of Political Economy and Development, London School of Economics,
U.K.;
9. Jomo Kwame Sundaram, Professor of Malaya, Malaysia; and former UN Assistant SecretaryGeneral for Economic and Social Affairs.
10.Jean Dreze, Professor of Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics, India;
11.Guy Standing, Professorial Fellow, SOAS – University of London, U.K.;
12.Yanis Varoufakis, Professor of Economics, University of Athens, Greece;
13.Irene van Staveren; Professor of Economics, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
14.Jane Humphries, Centennial Professor/Professor Emerita of Economic History, London School of
Economics/Oxford University, U.K.
15.Daniela Gabor, Professor of Economics and Micro-Finance, University of West England, U.K.;
16.Ha-Joon Chang, Research Professor of Economics, SOAS – University of London, U.K.;
17.Alfredo Saad Filho, Professor of Economics, Kings College – London, U.K.;
18.Sanjay Reddy, Professor of Economics, New School for Social Research, NY, USA;
19.Rolph van der Hoeven, Professor of Employment and Development Economics, International
Institute of Social Studies, The Netherlands;
20.Jungi Tokunaga, Professor of Economics, Dokkyo University – Tokyo, Japan;
21.Yavuz Yasar, Professor of Economics, University of Denver – Colorado, USA;
22.Ben Fine, Professor of Economics, SOAS – University of London, U.K.;
23.C. P. Chandrasekhar, Professor and Senior Research Fellow, Political Economy of Research Institute,
University of Massachusetts-Amherst, USA
24.Alicia Girón, Professor and Director University Studies Program on Asia and Africa, UNAM-Mexico
25.Costas Lapavitsas, Professor of Economics, SOAS – University of London, U.K.;
26.Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky, Professor and Researcher – CONICET, Argentina, former UN Independent
Expert on Debt and Human Rights.
27.Ipek Ilkkaracan, Professor of Economics, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey;
28.Sergio Cesaratto, Professor of Economics, University of Sienna, Italy.
29.Lawrence King, Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, USA;30.Mahalya Chatterjee, Professor of Economics, Calcutta University, India;
31.Nancy Folbre, Professor Emerita of Economics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, USA;
32.Ravi Bhandari, Professor of Economics, Skyline Community College, USA;
33.Utsa Patnaik, Professor Emerita of Economics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India;
34.Sudip Chaudhuri, Professor of Economics, Centre for Development Studies – Trivandrum, India;
35.Yana Rodgers, Professor of Economics, Rutgers University, NJ, USA;
36.Gunseli Berik, Professor of Economics, University of Utah, USA;
37.Prabhat Patnaik, Professor Emeritus of Economics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India;
38.Lucas Chancel, Professor and Co-Director – World Inequality Lab, Paris School of Economics.
39.Lee Badgett, Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, USA;
40.Radhika Balakrishnan, Professor of Economics & Women and Gender Studies, Rutgers University,
USA;
41.Randy Abelda, Professor Emerita of Economics and Public Policy, University of MassachusettsBoston, USA;
42.David F Ruccio, Professor Emeritus of Economics, University of Notre Dame, USA;
43.Heidi Hartmann, Professor of Economics and International Development, American University,
USA;
44.Gerald Epstein, Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, USA;
45.Smriti Rao, Professor of Economics, Assumption University, USA;
46.Naila Kabeer, Professor of Gender and Development, London School of Economics, U.K.
47.Barbara Harriss-White, Professor Emerita of Development Studies, Oxford University, U.K.;
48.Aaron Schneider, Professor and Leo Block Chair – Development, University of Denver, USA;
49.Kanchana N Ruwanpura, Professor of Development Geography, University of Gothenburg, Sweden;
50.Raj Patel, Research Professor, Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Policy, University of Texas-Austin,
USA;
51.Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah; Professor Emeritus of Law, National University of Singapore,
Singapore;
52.Vinay Gidwani, Professor of Geography, Environment and Society, University of Minnesota, USA;
53.Vasuki Nesiah, Professor of Practice in Human Rights and International Law, New York University,
USA;
54.Page Fortna, Harold Brown Professor of U.S. Foreign Security and Security Policy, Columbia
University, USA.
55.Shirin Rai, Research Professor of International Development, SOAS – University of London, U.K.;
56.Suzanne Bergeron, Helen M Graves Professor of Women’s Studies and Social Sciences, University
of Michigan-Dearbon, U.S.A.;
57.Kanishka Goonewardena, Professor of Human Geography, University of Toronto, Canada;
58.Dia da Costa, Professor of Social Justice and International Studies, University of Alberta, Canada;
59.Kanishka Jayasuriya, Professor of Politics and International Studies, Murdoch University, Australia;
60.Kevin Gallagher, Professor of Global Development Policy, The Frederick S Pardee School of Global
Studies, Boston University, USA;
61.Arjun Guneratne, Professor of Anthropology, Macalster College, USA;
62.Pasuk Phonpaichat, Professor Emerita of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand;
63.Roger Jeffrey, Professor of Development Sociology, University of Edinburgh, U.K.;
64.Ben Selwyn, Professor of International Development, University of Sussex, U.K.;
65.Jennifer Olmstead, Professor of Economics, Drew University, U.S.A.;
66.Parthapratim Pal, Professor of Economics, India Institute of Management – Calcutta, India;
67.S. Charusheela, Professor of Economics and Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Washington,
USA;
68.Philip McMichael, Professor Emeritus of Development Sociology, Cornell University, USA;
69.John Harriss, Professor Emeritus of International Development, Simon Fraser University, Canada;
70.Kendra Strauss, Professor of Labour Studies, Simon Fraser University, Canada;71.Mritiunjoy Mohanty, Professor of Economics, Indian Institute of Management – Calcutta, India;
72.Pablo Bortz, Professor of Economics, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Argentina and
Researcher at CONICET.
73.Padraig Carmody, Professor of Economic Geography, Trinity College – Dublin, Ireland;
74.John Morrissey, Professor of Geography, National University of Ireland, Ireland;
75.Michele Gamburd, Professor of Anthropology, Portland State University, USA;
76.Elizabeth Dean Herman, Professor of Urbanism and Landscape, Rhodes School of Design, USA;
77.Jonathan Walters, Professor of Religion and Bill Hudson Chair of Humanities, Whitman College,
USA;
78.Dip Kapoor, Professor of International Education, University of Alberta, Canada;
79.Maggie Leung, Professor of International Development, University of Amsterdam, The
Netherlands;
80.David Hulme, Professor of Development Studies, University of Manchester, U.K.;
81.Adil Najam, Professor of International Relations, Earth and Environment, Boston University, USA;
82.Patrick R Ireland, Professor of Political Science, Illinois Institute of Technology, USA;
83.Rainer Kattel, Professor of Innovation and Public Governance, UCL, U.K.;
84.Roar Høstaker, Professor of Sociology, Inland University of Applied Sciences, Norway;
85.Gustavo Indart, Professor Emeritus of Economics, University of Toronto, Canada;
86.Nirmala Salgado, Professor of Religion, Augustana College, USA;
87.Jonathan Goodhand, Professor of Conflict and Development Studies, SOAS – University of London,
U.K.
88.S Subramanian, former Professor and Independent Scholar, India;
89.Ann Blackburn, Old Dominion Professor in the Humanities, Cornell University, USA;
90.Sunanda Sen, Levy Economics Institute – Bard College, USA;
91.Namika Raby, Professor of Anthropology, California State University – Long Beach, USA;
92.Maria Heim, Crosby Professor of Religion, Amherst College, USA;
93.Christian Barry, Professor of Political Philosophy, Australian National University, Australia;
94.Alicia Puyana, Professor of Economics, Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences, Mexico;
95.R Ramakumar, Professor of Developing Societies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences – Mumbai, India;
96.Venkatesh Athreya, former Professor of Development Economics, India;
97.Rahula Mukhherji, Professor and Head of Political Science, South Asia Institute, University of
Heidelberg, Germany;
98.Kalinga Tudor Silva, Emeritus Professor Sociology, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka;
99.Ruvani Ranasinha, Professor of Post-Colonial Studies, Kings College – University of London, U.K.;
100. Sushil Khanna, Professor Emeritus of Economics, India Institute of Management – Calcutta,
India;
101. Ishac Diwan, Director of Research – Finance for Development Lab, Paris School of Economics,
France;
102. Devaka Gunawardena, Research Scholar, USA;
103. Sirisha Naidu, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, USA;
104. Karna Basu, Associate Professor of Economics, Hunter College and The Graduate Centre, City
University of New York, USA;
105. Mwangi wa Githinji, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts –
Amherst, USA;
106. Gabriel Zucman, Associate Professor of Economics, University of California – Berkeley, USA;
107. Dean Baker, Senior Economist, Centre for Economics and Policy Research, USA;
108. Mary Wrenn, Senior Lecturer – Economics, University of West England, U.K.;
109. Gabriela Koehler, Economist, UNRISD, Switzerland;
110. Surbi Kesar, Lecturer – Development Economics, SOAS – University of London, U.K.;
111. Lynda Pickburn, Associate Professor of Economics, Hampshire College, USA;
112. Abena Oduro, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Ghana, Ghana;113. Smita Ramnarain, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Rhode Island, USA;
114. Susan Randolph, Emerita Associate Professor of Development Economics, University of
Connecticut, USA;
115. Vamsi Vakulabharanam; Associate Professor of Economics, University of MassachusettsAmherst, USA;
116. Grieve Chelwa, Inaugural Post-Doctoral Fellow, Institute on Race and Political Economy, New
School University, USA;
117. Eduardo Strachman, Associate Professor of Economics, Sao Paolo State University, Brazil;
118. Ingrid Kvangraven; Lecturer – International Development, King College, U.K.;
119. Jerome Roos, Fellow in International Political Economy; London School of Economics, U.K.;
120. Paul R. Gilbert, Senior Lecturer – International Development, Sussex University, U.K.;
121. Sheba Thejani, Lecturer – International Development, Kings College – London, U.K.;
122. Joshua Gellers, Associate Professor International Affairs, University of North Florida, USA;
123. Nachi Mani, Associate Professor of Economics, Erode Arts and Science College, India;
124. Isabella Weber, Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, USA;
125. Ram Manikkalingam, Director – Dialougue Advisory Group, The Netherlands and Sri Lanka;
126. Bengi Akbulut, Associate Professor of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia
University, Canada;
127. Madhumita Dutta, Assistant Professor of Geography, Ohio State University, USA;
128. Alessandra Mezzadri, Reader in Global Development and Political Economy, SOAS – University
of London, U.K.;
129. Alicia Y Lamin; Lecturer in Law, Harvard University, USA;
130. Chris Baker, Historian, Political Economist, Author, Bangkok, Thailand;
131. Andres Arauz, Senior Research Fellow – Economics, Centre for Economic and Policy Research,
USA;
132. Caroline Shenaz Hossein, Associate Professor of Global Development, University of Toronto,
Canada;
133. Alexander da Costa, Associate Professor of Social Justice and International Education,
University of Alberta, Canada;
134. Jennifer Cohen, Associate Professor of Global and Intercultural Studies, University of Miami –
Ohio, USA;
135. Steven Jordan, Associate Professor of Integrated Studies, McGill University, Canada;
136. Pratheep Kumar, Assistant Professor of Law and Economics, CVV, India;
137. Sarah Small, Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Utah, USA;
138. Darini Rajasingham-Senanayake, Anthropologist, Independent Researcher, Sri Lanka;
139. Bart Klem, Associate Professor of Peace and Development Studies, School of Global Studies,
University of Gothenburg, SWEDEN;
140. Jesim Pais, Director – Society for Social and Economic Research, India;
141. Lenore M Palladino, Assistant Professor of Economics and Public Policy, University of
Massachusetts-Amherst, USA;
142. Kalim Siddiqui, Senior Lecturer – Economics, University of Huddersfield, U.K.;
143. Rajni Gamage, Post Doctoral Fellow, National University of Singapore, Singapore;
144. Shanaz Akhatar, Postdoctoral Researcher – International Studies, University of Warwick, U.K.;
145. Dina M Siddiqi, Clinical Associate Professor, New York University, USA;
146. Geethika Dharmasinghe, Visiting Assistant Professor, Colgate University, USA;
147. Eva Ambos, Research Fellow, University of Tubingen, Germany;
148. Susan A Reed, Associate Professor of Women and Gender Studies, Bucknell University, USA;
149. Sankar Varma, Research Scholar, Kerala Council for Historical Research, India;
150. Narayani Sritharan, Fellow – Development Economics, Williams and Mary College, USA;
151. Ayse Arslan, Assistant Professor of Development Studies, Haceteppe University, Turkey;
152. Rohith Jyothish, Assistant Professor of Political Economy, O. P. Jindhal University, India;153. Giselle Thompson, Assistant Professor – Black Studies in Education, University of Alberta,
Canada;
154. Priyanthi Fernando, Executive Director – International Women’s Rights Action Watch-Asia
Pacific; Sri Lanka;
155. Deepta Chopra, Research Fellow, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, U.K.;
156. Heloise Weber, Senior Lecturer – International Studies, The University of Queensland,
Australia,
157. Bishop Akolgo, Director, International Social Development Centre, Canada;
158. Gilad Isaacs, Lecturer – Economics, Institute of Economic Justice, University of the
Witwatersrand, South Africa;
159. Chirashree Das Gupta, Associate Professor – Economics and Political Economy, Jawaharlal
Nehru University, India;
160. Joeri Scholtens, Assistant Professor – Geography, Planning and International Development,
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
161. Samuel Jamiru Braima, Senior Lecturer, Fourah Bay College – University of Sierra Leon, Sierra
Leone;
162. Charles Abugre, Executive Director, International Development Economics Associates, Accra,
Ghana.
163. Samanthi Gunawardana, Senior Lecturer – Gender and Development, Monash University,
Australia;
164. Stanley Chitukwi, Chief Executive Officer, AFRES, Malawi;
165. Gregor Semieniuk, Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst,
USA;
166. Sudhanva Deshpande, Managing Editor, Leftword Books, India;
167. Farah Mihlar, Senior Lecturer in Human Rights, Oxford Brookes University, U.K.;
168. Kiran Grewal, Reader in Sociology, Goldsmiths College, U.K.;
169. Himanshu, Associate Professor of Economics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India;
170. Ajit Zacharias, Senior Scholar, Levy Economics Institute, USA;
171. Sree Padma Holt, Associate Research Fellow, Bowdoin College, USA;
172. Dharshana Kasthurirathna, Senior Lecturer, Sri Lanka Institute of Technology (SLIT), Sri Lanka;
173. Shyamain Wickramasinghe, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Copenhagen Business School,
Denmark;
174. Nimanthi Rajasingham-Perera, Associate Professor of Women’s Studies, Colgate University,
USA;
175. Mythri Jegathesan, Associate Professor of Anthropology, Santa Clara University, USA;
176. Bernard Anaba, Policy Analyst, The Integrated Social Development Centre, Ghana;
177. Sharika Thiranagama, Associate Professor of Anthropology, Stanford University, USA;
178. Amitav Ghosh, Novelist/Anthropologist, USA and India;
179. Dhanusha Gihan Pathirana, Independent Economist, Sri Lanka;
180. Agustina Calcagno, South Feminist Futures, Argentina;
181. Roman Rafael Vega Romero, Global Coordinator, People’s Health Movement, Columbia;
182. Iratxe Perea Ozerin, University of the Basque Country, Basque Country, Spain;

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sri Lanka’s ‘Sancharaka Udawa’ tourist fair seeks to involve universities

ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s ‘Sancharaka Udawa’ tourism fair kicked off this week to promote interaction between industry stakeholders and relevant Government bodies, including the Tourist Police, and also universities.

“Several universities, including Colombo, Uva Wellasa, Kelaniya, Sabaragamuwa and Rajarata were given free stalls to facilitate student interaction with industry professionals,” Chairman of the Sancharaka Udawa Organising Committee, Charith De De Alwis said in a statement.

The event takes place today (18) at the BMICH and houses stalls for hoteliers, tour and transport services, with a goal of attracting 10,000 visitors.

Organized by the Sri Lanka Association of Inbound Tour Operators (SLAITO) and the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau (SLTPB), the 11th edition of Sancharaka Udawa offers a platform for both B2B and B2C sectors.

“Sancharaka Udawa houses over 170 exhibitors and a footfall of more than 10,000 visitors,” De Alwis said.

This year’s edition will include participants from outbound tourism sectors to facilitate capacity building. The event provides networking opportunities for industry newcomers and veterans.

“The networking platform offers opportunity for small and medium-sized service providers integrating them into the broader tourism landscape. The anticipated outcome is a substantial increase in bookings particularly for regional small-scale tourism service providers.” (Colombo/May18/2024)

Continue Reading

Sri Lanka’s CEB sells LTL shares to West Coast IPP for Rs26bn

ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s state-run Ceylon Electricity Board has sold shares of an affiliate to West Coast Power Company Limited, an independent power producer giving profits of 25.9 billion rupees in the March 2024 quarter, interim accounts showed.

The sale has been carried out as a transfer.

“Twenty-eight percent (28-pct) of share ownership of CEB within LTL Holding’s equity capital has been transferred to West Coast Power Company Ltd for a total consideration of Rs 26 billion as part of a partial settlement of outstanding dues…” the March interim accounts said.

“This transaction resulted in a net gain of Rs25.9 billion rupees which has been recognized and reflected in the ‘Gain from Share Disposal’ in the individual financial statement in CEB.”

LTL Holdings is a former transformer making unit of the CEB set up with ABB where the foreign holding was sold to its management.

The firm has since set up several IPPs.

West Coast Power operates a 300MW combined cycle IPP in Kerawalapitiya promoted by LTL group liked firms in which both the Treasury and Employees Provident Fund also have shares.

Its operational and maintenance contract is with Lakdhanavi, another private IPP. The firm has been paying dividends.

The capital gain from the transfer of shares helped the CEB post profits to 84 billion rupees for the March 2024 quarter.

CEB reported gross profits of 62.7 billion rupees from energy sales and 30.6 billion rupees in other income and gains in the March 2024 quarter. Other income was only 3.1 billion rupees in last year. (Colombo/May18/2024)

Continue Reading

Sri Lanka mulls mandating prices for shopping bags in supermarkets

ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka may end the practice of supermarkets giving free shopping bags, as part of efforts to contain plastic use according to deliberations at a parliamentary committee following a supreme court decision.

Sri Lanka’s courts many years ago barred supermarkets from charging for plastic bags from customers after activists went to court.

However a Supreme Court ruled in March this year to overturn that.

The parliament Sectoral Oversight Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development said it could not reverse the gazette issued under the Consumer Affairs Authority Act until it had received a copy of the ruling.

The committee said the ruling might prompt shoppers to bring their own bags, which would lead to a reduction in polythene waste.

It may only apply to supermarkets and not to smaller merchants, however. (Colombo/May18/2024)

Continue Reading