Sri Lanka LB Finance ‘A-(lka)’ confirmed, Fitch expected import controls to drive gold loans
ECONOMYNEXT – Fitch Ratings has confirmed an ‘A-(lka)’ rating of LB Finance, Sri Lanka’s third largest non-bank finance leasing company (FLC) and is expecting the firm to lend more on gold-backed loans as import controls have hit vehicle leasing.
“Our assessment of the operating environment for Sri Lankan FLCs incorporates the significant economic disruption caused by the pandemic, particularly, the negative implications for FLCs through the effect on their largely sub-prime clientele and any extension of motor-vehicle import restrictions,” Fitch Ratings said.
“Fitch regards LB’s risk appetite as high relative to that of peers due to its large exposure to gold loans (FY20: 25% of gross loans).
“We expect this exposure to further increase in the near to medium term, supported by rising gold prices, and as such, compensating for the slowdown in its vehicle-financing business.”
Sri Lanka has controlled the spread of Coronavirus effectively through aggressive tracing and quarantine measures, but import controls have been slammed after money printing triggered forex shortages in March amid spike in private credit.
Private bank credit has turned negative in May and June 2020.
Sri Lanka has a soft-pegged central bank built by a Federal Reserve expert based on the same philosophy that several Latin America central banks were set up, which are prone to forex shortages and import substitution.
Sudden policy changes are triggered each time the currency falls sometimes under International Monetary Fund backed programs, changing the stability of the operating environment for businesses and people, which analysts call regime uncertainty.
Fitch said LB Finance has managed it gold-backed loans so far with monitoring and risk control, but had lowered the margin requirement from 15 percent to 8 percent.
Gold prices have picked up in 2020 amid money printing by the Federal Reserve which weakened the US dollar. However the US has started to withdraw some of the liquidity.
“Defaults on its gold-backed lending portfolio remain minimal, despite having increased during the period,” Fitch said.
“However, we believe a sharp fall in global gold prices could threaten LB’s asset quality as its safety margins erode and borrowers deliberately default.”
Fitch said Sri Lanka’s finance leasing companies would face higher levels of default given their exposure to higher risk customers.
LB Finance’s five month non-performing loan ratio has increased to 6.6 percent in the June quarter from 3.9 percent last year.
The full statement is given below:
Fitch Affirms LB Finance at ‘A-(lka)’; Outlook Stable
Fitch Ratings – Colombo – 11 Sep 2020: Fitch Ratings (Lanka) has affirmed LB Finance PLC’s National Long-Term Rating at ‘A-(lka)’. The Outlook is Stable. At the same time, Fitch has affirmed the company’s Sri Lanka rupee-denominated senior unsecured debt at ‘A-(lka)’ and its rupee-denominated subordinated debt at ‘BBB(lka)’.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT RATINGS
LB’s National Long-Term Rating is driven by its intrinsic financial strength and reflects its established domestic franchise as Sri Lanka’s third-largest finance and leasing company (FLC), accounting for 10% of total FLC-sector assets as at the financial year ending March 2020 (FY20). It also reflects high profitability from high-yielding products and satisfactory capital levels. This is counterbalanced by a high risk appetite due to a large and increasing exposure to gold-backed lending.
Our assessment of the operating environment for Sri Lankan FLCs incorporates the significant economic disruption caused by the pandemic, particularly, the negative implications for FLCs through the effect on their largely sub-prime clientele and any extension of motor-vehicle import restrictions.
We expect the country’s GDP to contract by 1.3% in 2020, and for GDP growth to recover in 2021, although growth prospects will partly depend on how the pandemic develops in Sri Lanka and globally.
Fitch regards LB’s risk appetite as high relative to that of peers due to its large exposure to gold loans (FY20: 25% of gross loans). We expect this exposure to further increase in the near to medium term, supported by rising gold prices, and as such, compensating for the slowdown in its vehicle-financing business.
LB has so far managed its gold-loan exposure through regular monitoring and risk control measures, such as maintaining adequate margins to protect against a drop in the market price. However, in FY19, LB lowered this margin requirement to 8%, from 15% in FY18, indicating its increased appetite for gold-backed lending.
We expect asset-quality pressure to be more pronounced for FLCs, such as LB, given their exposure to more vulnerable customer segments. LB’s asset quality, as measured by its five-month gross non-performing loan ratio, deteriorated to 6.6% in 1QFY21 (FY20: 3.9%, FY19: 2.7%) as a result of the pandemic and the lockdown that followed. Defaults on its gold-backed lending portfolio remain minimal, despite having increased during the period. However, we believe a sharp fall in global gold prices could threaten LB’s asset quality as its safety margins erode and borrowers deliberately default.
LB’s profitability metrics, in Fitch’s view, are expected to deteriorate in FY21 as a result of thinner net interest margins as well as higher credit costs amid potential loan-book contraction that would offset the benefits from a reduction in income taxes and the removal of the debt-repayment levy. LB’s pre-tax profit/average total assets more than halved in 1QFY21 to 3.1%, from 7.0% in FY20, due to a drop in business volumes and a surge in credit costs during the lockdown period. The company’s profitability is supported by its significant exposure to high-yielding products, such as gold-backed lending and registered three-wheeler financing.
Increased bank borrowings to support liquidity has offset higher internal-capital generation, resulting in broadly unchanged levels of balance-sheet leverage from FY20. LB’s leverage is among the highest of domestic peers, at 5x, but we expect it to moderate on lower lending expectations and reasonable profitability.
Its regulatory capital ratios are in line with those of peers and it also benefits from capital-efficient product classes, such as gold-backed lending. This is evident in its low risk density relative to peers. However, we believe risks to capital impairment have increased, as seen in a higher unprovided share of impaired loans/equity ratio of 35% in FY20, from 21% in FY19.
We expect LB to rely on unsecured deposit funding (1QFY21: 75% of funding) alongside secured, wholesale, term borrowings from banks. LB’s non-deposit funding increased by around 12% in 1QFY21, to account for 25% of total funding (FY20: 22%), as it drew down its unutilised credit lines from banks in anticipation of a tighter liquidity position and potential flight to quality. Furthermore, lack of new lending has helped reduce LB’s liquidity risk, with its share of liquid assets in total assets improving to 15.6% in 1QFY21 (FY20: 10.5%).
LB’s senior debentures are rated in line with the company’s National Long-Term Rating, as they rank equally with claims of the company’s other senior unsecured creditors.
The subordinated debentures are rated two notches below LB’s National Long-Term Rating to reflect the subordination to senior unsecured obligations, in line with the Bank Rating Criteria. Fitch’s baseline notching of two notches for loss severity reflects our expectation of poor recovery. we have not applied additional notching to the notes for non-performance risk, as they have no going-concern loss-absorption features, in line with Fitch criteria.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
An upgrade is not probable in the near-term due to the pressure on the sovereign rating (B-/Negative) and operating environment. In the medium to longer term, an upgrade is contingent on LB achieving lower leverage relative to peers, lower-risk asset exposure and a sustained improvement in its liquidity position.
LB’s senior and subordinated debt would be upgraded if the company’s National Long-Term Rating is upgraded
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
A deterioration of the operating environment, which could be triggered by a further worsening of the economy beyond our base-case expectations, resulting in additional weakening of key credit metrics, such as asset quality, profitability and capitalisation, could trigger a downgrade. This could be in the form of higher capital impairment risks.
LB’s senior and subordinated debt would be downgraded if the company’s National Long-Term Rating is downgraded.