An Echelon Media Company
Saturday June 15th, 2024

Sumanthiran says Minister Weerasekara is responsible if he is harmed

TNA MP M A Sumanthiran/Facebook

ECONOMYNEXT- Tamil National Alliance Parliamentarian M.A. Sumanthiran says if any harm comes to him Public Security Minister Sarath Weerasekara should be held personally responsible as there are multiple threats to his life and his STF guards have been withdrawn.

Sumanthiran’s statement came after Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa raised the issue in Parliament requesting Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardene to intervene in the matter of the withdrawal of Special Task Force security personnel for the TNA MP.

The STF guards were pulled out last week after Sumanthiran attended a rally in Polikandy on the Northern Peninsula at the end of the P2P march by Tamil and Muslim Civil Society activists staged a rally there.

Replying to the Opposition Leader Weerasekara said that he removed the STF personnel from Sumanthiran’s security as he participated in a rally disobeying police and Court orders explicitly not to do so.

“When a person participates in a rally disobeying the police orders, police security cannot be given to such person and if he has such threats to his life he shouldn’t have gone to a place where 2000-2500 people are around,” he added.

Moreover, he said that If nothing happened to him even after going to such a place that means there is no such threat to him.

“That’s why the STF was removed, as previously I have privately informed him that there are threats to his life and he should act to look after his security,” Weerasekara said.

He said that it is a joke to give security to a person who goes to places disobeying police and court orders

However, Premadasa said that Sri Lanka is not a country governed by an authoritarian regime and there is parliamentary democracy and freedom of expression to gather and go to rallies.

“When we also tried to demonstrate in a silent protest in Tanamalwila, a court order was issued, what kind shameful act is that,” he asked.

He also added that not only Sumanthiran but every citizen in Sri Lanka has the freedom to go on a peaceful protest because that is their democratic right.

Moreover, he said that it is another matter to take legal action against Sumanthiran if he has broken some law but it is wrong to remove his security based on what was said by the Minister.

Weerasekara said that the STF officers were not removed from the MP as a revengeful act.

“ I am not ready to make the police, army and the STF under me a cowardly force as long as I’m their head,” Weerasekara said.

He said that Sumanthiran a few months ago commemorated a terrorist killed by the army, in a room while the STF was outside providing him security.

“At that moment we thought of removing the STF, then I personally informed him that we will keep his security as he has threats to his life,” he added.

Also, joining the debate Field Marshall Sarath Fonseka said that the court order was issued against the P2P rally based on the quarantine regulations.

“So it does not balance out removing the security of an MP because he violated quarantine regulations,” he added.

He also said that the government is providing security to Karuna Amman and Pillayan, who murdered police and army officers.

“You have given security to terrorists, it is a shame for the army personnel to provide security to them, Sumanthiran always spoke against terrorists and stood against them so we don’t believe that you removed his security based on one incident,” Fonseka said.

Sumanthiran responding to Minister Weerasekara said that no court order issued against the protest had mentioned his name.

“There is no court order against me, therefore I have not violated any single court order,” he said

But he added that even if he did have a court order against him, it is not a reason to remove the special security accorded to me on the account of threat assessment done by the state.

Further, he said that about a month ago, Minister Weerasekara met me at the Parliament lobby and informed him that threats against him still exist and to be careful.

He said that based on that his security was increased and an additional contingent of STF was provided to him.

Moreover, he said that there three to four cases pending in courts about attempts on his life and in one case under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) four were indicted for attempting on his life.

He also said that more than 30 people are in remand for attempts on my life, “I didn’t know that I was that important. But this is what the state has done I have not made a single complaint,” he added.

“What is there to give pardon? I don’t need to be given a pardon by anybody, I have not done anything wrong, if there is a threat to my life and you yourself have said, then it is incumbent on the state to provide that special security which you deemed necessary. How I behave is of no relevance to the matter of granting of security to me. If anything is to happen to me Sarath Weerasekara should be held personally responsible,” Sumanthiran said.

(Colombo/Feb10/2021)

Reported by Imesh Ranasinghe

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sri Lanka beats key IMF program targets for March 2024 amid rupee stability

ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka has exceeded key quantitative targets set in an International Monetary Fund program for March 2024, based on preliminary data the Washington based agency said in a report.

The March data are not performance criteria on which reviews are conducted but are indicative targets which shows the progress of the program and are a stepping stone for a September review based on June data.

An indicative target for the primary balance (roughly overall deficit minus interest costs), was assessed at 316 billion rupees more than four times the 70 billion rupee target set in the program.

Primary balance can be a big surplus if the interest bill is high and capital expenditure is cut and is a type of crisis management tool after a central bank triggers a currency crisis by cutting rates with inflationary liquidity tools.

However, Sri Lanka’s Treasury has also kept a lid on most current spending. A state salary hike is however due after the currency collapse made life difficult for everyone.

Meanwhile more taxes have been collected from the people to finance the island’s bloated state.

A 750 billion rupees central government tax revenue floor has been exceeded to reach 837 billion rupees.

Central bank credit to government (outstanding stock) has been reduced to 2,691 billion rupees in March compared to a target of 2,800 billion rupees. In December the CB credit was calculated 2,742 billion rupees.

Net international reserves of the central bank were brought up to a negative 1,268 million US dollars exceeding the target of a negative 2,035 by almost 700 million dollars.

In order to collect foreign reserves, which is a type of appropriation of domestic savings of the people by the central bank (taking in deposits) and exporting it to the US and other countries to finance their deficits or by other agency debt in reserve currencies.

In order to collect such ‘deposits’ the central bank has to prevent them from being invested domestically.

It is achieved with deflationary policy through sell-downs of down its Treasuries holding to domestic banks or others, at a market rate, collecting interest from the government or repayments of re-finance credits, subject to any nominal changes in reserve money at a given exchange rate.

In 2024 the central bank allowed the exchange rate to appreciate, which can also reduce prices of traded goods boost real and nominal savings and make it easier to collect foreign reserves.

When domestic credit is weak it is easier to collect reserves. Reduced domestic credit and collection of reserves, including by private banks which then cannot be invested domestically, can push the external current account into surplus.

The central bank also met a 5 percent 12-month inflation target, with an achievement of 4.3 percent.

Sri Lanka’s economy grew 5.3 percent despite reserve collections, amid the stability provided by the central bank.

There were no central bank purchases of Treasuries from the primary market.

However the central bank injected overnight and term money to banks (not on a net basis) showing how easy it is for a rate-obsessed monetary authority to get around the requirement and create external instability again as soon as private credit recovered.

The central bank also allowed excess liquidity from dollar purchase to remain unsterilized for an extended period under its ad hoc pegging arrangement, getting a short term falls in rates, but triggering pressure on the rupee as a result in May and June.

It is not possible to collect reserves with a free floating exchange rate. (Colombo/June15/2024)

Continue Reading

Sri Lanka GDP grows 5.3-pct in first quarter of 2024 amid monetary stability

ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s gross domestic product grew 5.3 percent in the first quarter of 2024 data from the state statistics office showed as the central bank continued to refrain from generating monetary instability.

Instead of printing money to cut rates under ‘flexible inflation targeting’ and printing money to boost growth by taking into account ‘potential output’ as permitted by its new monetary law, the central bank ran deflationary policy and also allowed the rupee to appreciate.

“The Sri Lanka economy experienced a more favorable economic condition[s] in the first quarter 2024, when compared to the first quarter in the year 2023,” the Department of Census and Statistics said.

“The high inflation had prevailed in the first quarter of year 2023, gradually reduced to a lower level by the first quarter of 2024 and this low inflation incentivized the economy by providing inputs at [a] much lower price.

The agriculture sector grew 1.1 percent in the first quarter of 2024, after also growing 1.6 percent last year.

Industry grew 11.8 percent in the first quarter, against a 24.3 percent last year.

The economy grew amid falling prices, the statistics office said in sharp contrast to the Anglophone macroeconomic claim that inflation is needed to boost growth, on which Sri Lanka has 5-7 inflation target has apparently been set.

Related Sri Lanka central bank pushing for high inflation target to boost growth

“Among ‘Industrial activities’, coinciding with the decline in input prices, the ‘Construction industry’ grew by 14.2 percent, parallel to this, the ‘Mining and quarrying’ industry too expanded by 18.3 percent during this quarter,” the Statistics Department said.

Sr Lanka’s services sector grew 2.6 percent, against a decline of 4.6 percent recorded last year.

The International Monetary Fund has also urged the central bank to give priority to stability.

Sri Lanka dropped the stability mandate in the earlier monetary law which was violated after the end of a civil war to push the country into serial currency crises especially after the International Monetary Fund gave technical assistance to calculate potential output.

Related Sri Lanka has a corrupted inflation targeting, output gap targeting not in line with monetary law: Wijewardena

Sri Lanka survived a 30-year civil war by giving priority to a stability mandate despite shortcomings in its operational framework but defaulted in peacetime amid activist monetary policy which denied monetary stability to the people. (Colombo/June12/2024)

Continue Reading

Sri Lanka’s NPP notes five-point crisis for economic growth sans details

Former JVP MP Sunil Handunneththi

ECONOMYNEXT — The leftist National People’s Power (NPP) has identified five crises that need resolving for Sri Lanka’s economy to progress, much of which emphasise a production economy targeting export growth though sparse on the detail on resource allocation.

NPP spokesman and former parliamentarian Sunil Handunneththi speaking at an event in Mulaitivu on Thursday June 13 said Sri Lanka is grappling with firstly, a collapse of the production economy, second, a budget deficit, third, a balance of payment crisis which has, fourthly, created a debt crisis, and finally, a resultant gap between haves and have-nots.

“We must first understand the crisis. We reocgnise five main crises that have the same impact irrespective of differences between the north and south.

“The first is the collapse of the production economy. We can see this historically. Agriculture that used to be some 30 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) has now fallen to 8 percent. Essential food is imported. We cannot produce the rice needed for the small population here. Things that can be made here are also imported.

“Second is the income crisis. For the people, their expenses are twice their income. The budget deficit is two or three-fold every day. Banks cannot give loans to businesses and industries because the government takes funds to address the budget deficit. The government takes most of the people’s savings for this,” he said.

The balance of payment crisis Sri Lanka is facing the third crisis, according to Handunneththi, which has triggered a debt crisis, in turn leading to a crisis of income disparity among the people.

“Third is the balance of payments crisis. Imports are two or three fold export income. The government has to take 11 to 12 billion US dollars in loans from foreign countries. When GDP is 80 billion US dollars, debt has gone over 100.”

“All this creates a massive gap between haves and have-nots. Without finding solutions to these crisis, there is no point distributing goods,” he said.

Handunnethi’s remarks appear to be departure from the NPP’s anti-corruption rhetoric which had centred its economic development policy agenda primarily on fighting corruption.

‘Fighting corruption’ and ‘recovering stolen assets’ have been popular slogans since the Aragalaya protests in Sri Lanka and the NPP has made it its central theme in its bid for power. The leftist outfit had also adopted a position that’s cautiously critical of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the reforms the international lender has prescribed for Sri Lanka in exchange for a 2.9 billion-dollar bailout.

However, NPP leadership had recently acknowledged the need to continue the IMF programme since the agreement has already been signed.

The Marxist-Leninist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, which controls the NPP, though it was never in government barring a brief stint in an Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP)-led coalition in the early 2000s, has been instrumental in driving popular support against privatisation.

Three key policy pillars articulated by the JVP from 2001-2004 and embraced by mainstream politician Mahinda Rajapaksa’s administration in 2005 onward have been highlighted by experts.

From 2005, Sri Lanka halted privatisation, started recruiting tens of thousands of unemployed graduates into the public service every year with lifetime pensions, expanding an already bloated public sector and denying any benefit of a peace dividend to the country.

Sri Lanka also abandoned a price formula for fuel that had helped keep the rupee stable and inflation low from 2001 to 2003 even as global commodity prices went up from the ‘mother of all liquidity bubbles’ fired by the Federal Reserve from 2001.

From 2001 to 2003, state workers fell from 1.164 million to 1.043 million. By 2020, the public sector cadre has grown to 1.58 million with another batch of 53,000 unemployed graduates being paid tax money. (Colombo/Jun14/2024)

Continue Reading