ECONOMYNEXT – A bill to amend Sri Lanka’s National Environment Act currently before Parliament seeks to tighten quality requirements in Environmental Impact Assessments and introduce stricter penalties for violators, a public policy think tank has said commending the move.
The amendments introduce several EIA-related punishable offences, which will help strengthen the accountability of EIAs, the Centre for a Smart Future (CSF) said.
“One of the offences listed on the inclusion of “…misleading, false, or inaccurate information in EIA/IEE reports” tackles a critical issue that has been raised in recent research by CSF as well.”
“We uncovered a systemic lack of quality in EIA reporting, making EIA reports inaccessible and unreliable. Holding preparers accountable is vital to making sure EIAs are actionable tools that help safeguard ecosystems and communities, rather than bureaucratic checklists,” Senith Abeyanayake, CSF Research Associate said.
Abeyanayake is author of a CSF report titled, ‘Assessing the Assessments: An Analysis of Social Impacts Reported in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) in Sri Lanka’, which studied 250 EIA reports over the 1991-2025 period.
The think tank welcomed the amendments being introduced to guard against conflicts of interest when appointing Project Approving Agencies.
“Many people tend to overlook that an EIA has become more than just a mandated ‘environmental clearance’ for a project – EIAs have de facto become a signal of overall project approval. A wide range of stakeholders now rely on these documents both before and after the project approval stage,” Abeyanayake added.
Improving the quality of EIA reporting – especially on social impact reporting, where major weaknesses have been observed – will strengthen overall economic governance and ensure more sustainable and inclusive development projects, CSF said.
The amendment bill enters Committee Stage debate this week (9). (Colombo/Jun8/2026)