ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court has taken up for hearing a case filed by Transparency International, an anti-corruption watchdog, against some procurement guidelines of the government on entertaining unsolicited projects.
Unsolicited proposals tend to bypass competition and undermine transparency in procurement, the plaintiff said in the case which named the National Procurement Commission and its key officials as respondents.
“Unsolicited proposals increase the potential for corruption,” Transparency International said in its plaint.
“Without the checks and balances that come with a formal, competitive procurement process, there is an elevated risk of bribes, kickbacks, or other unethical practices influencing the awarding of contracts.
“This can result in the selection of companies that offer personal benefits to officials, rather than those that are most qualified or offer the best value for public money.
“When a proposal is submitted without the government’s prior identification of needs, there is a risk that it may not align with the country’s actual requirements or priorities.
“This can result in unnecessary spending on projects or services that were not originally planned for, thereby diverting limited and/or scarce resources from more urgent or necessary initiatives.”
Viran Corea PC with Pramod Perera and Shermina Bangsajayah appeared for Transparency Internatonal and Navodi De Zoysa, SC appeared for the respondents.
TI asked court to direct the respondents to come up with guidelines with due safeguards.
Procurement Guidelines published in December 2024 and a Procurement Manual published in January 2025, have shortcomings, TI said.
Several countries and international organizations have developed more extensive criteria to more adequately ensure due transparency and minimise corruption risks when entering into unsolicited proposals. (Colombo/Jun13/2025)